Discussion about this post

User's avatar
fport's avatar

This was going somewhere else:

Myth vs. Paraphilia:

The myth is akin to parasitic patterns, which create agency through belief and attention without needing external validation. It reinforces reality by making individuals believe even if they don’t fully understand it.

Parasitic Patterns:

These patterns amplify existence through belief and attention, reinforcing reality regardless of its validity or construction. They function as a loop that remains real whether the myth is true or constructed.

Heidegger’s Life Being Lived:

The life becomes an illusion to a personified face, who gains agency by believing in it. This mirrors how parasitic patterns reinforce belief and attention without needing external validation.

Schmitt’s Distinction on Exceptions:

Schmitt distinguishes between exceptions proving everything (breaking down mechanisms) versus normal cases not proving anything. The myth of the general strike is similar to exception, where power comes from belief and attention rather than facts or critique.

Falsification as Exception:

Falsification occurs when exceptions are used to distort reality into political actions, creating a loop that reinforces existence through agency without needing external validation.

In essence, both Schmitt’s concept of exceptions in politics/society and the myth of the general strike rely on belief and attention to amplify existence. They create power by reinforcing reality through these mechanisms, making them effective even if they are not entirely real or constructed.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?